MLS data-sharing effort adds 3 members

Board for separate statewide group meets this week

Inman News

The vendor for the California MLSAlliance, a real estate data-sharing system in California that pools property information from multiple listing service organizations across the state, announced this month that three more groups have joined the system, bringing the total to 15.

The South Tahoe Association of Realtors, Coastal Mendocino Association of Realtors, and Lake County Association of Realtors are the latest additions to the group, according to an announcement by eNeighborhoods, a company that supplies technology for the platform.

California MLSAlliance was created in August 2007 through an agreement among 10 MLSs serving 45 local real estate associations.

Meanwhile, other separate MLS collaborative projects are proceeding in California.

CALMLS (see Inman News), a subsidiary of the California Association of Realtors, has received nonbinding letters of intent from most of the MLSs in the state to participate in a statewide MLS effort that will feature a statewide property information database that could become the default MLS system for participants.

Another effort, dubbed CARETS (see Inman News), has participation from a group of six MLSs, most of them in Southern California. CARETS is a data-sharing and standardization effort that seeks to create a common MLS database and common rules for users of participating MLSs.

A major driver for data-sharing efforts is to eliminate the need for agents and brokers to join several MLSs in order to effectively serve their clients, as MLSs can have separate membership fees, rules, forms and data fields for describing for-sale properties. And there are in some cases several MLSs serving the same market areas.

The California MLSAlliance data-sharing effort covers most of the state's 58 counties and is available to about 190,000 brokers and agents who are members of 53 local real estate associations, according to eNeighborhoods -- there were about 544,000 total real estate licensees in the state in May 2008, including 391,400 salespersons and 152,600 brokers, according to state licensing statistics.

And there were about 170,200 Realtors in the state as of May 31, according to National Association of Realtors statistics.

About 50,000 agents and brokers used the MLSAlliance system to search for property listings in the state during the month of May, eNeighborhoods reported, which was the highest level since the system was established.

The system provides access to information about 4 million for-sale and off-market properties in the state.

Woolley said that San Diego and San Jose are the only large metro areas that are not served by the MLSAlliance system.

He noted that there are "several parallel efforts" in the state to share MLS data with real estate professionals. The MLSAlliance system preserves the structure of participating MLSs.

Brokers who participate in the system can get data feeds for all properties shared through the MLSAlliance system, Woolley said, "instead of going to individual MLSs" to get separate feeds. Those feeds, which are compliant with Internet Data Exchange rules for sharing properties among brokers, can be displayed on brokers' Web sites, he said.

Agents and brokers who are members of groups that participate in the MLSAlliance can access the shared system through their MLS or by visiting the MLSAlliance site directly.

Woolley said there is definitely potential for the California MLSAlliance to spread outside of the state.

ENeighborhoods operates similar data-sharing networks in the Gulf Coast region of Florida and in Virginia. "They typically start with a core group (of participants), he said. Once they are up and functioning and live they attract other MLSs around that area."

The California alliance began as two separate regional systems that joined together.

The CALMLS effort, launched by the California Association of Realtors, is in the process of reviewing bids for the technology company that will operate the statewide database, said Mike Silvas, broker-owner of Napa-based Morgan Lane Inc. who leads the CALMLS board appointed in May. The board of directors are scheduled to meet on Wednesday.

Silvas said that members of the CALMLS board have been making presentations throughout the state to inform real estate agents and brokers about plans for the statewide initiative.

Some agents and brokers continue to express concerns about a statewide system allowing "agents who come into their marketplace who are not conversant with the marketplace," Silvas said.

He said that there appears to be a bit of a generational gap and a tech gap in the acceptance of the statewide MLS initiative, with some younger members of the real estate community responding that, "Hey, we need to get this done -- we need to get this done yesterday," and others who are not quite as tech-oriented commenting that "I don't nearly see the need."

He added, "This is just an educational process. All we're trying to do is bring them up to speed on where everything is at. We're trying to be as transparent as we possibly can and we're trying to be as inclusive as we can."

The board has begun the process in forming advisory groups -- each with a special focus such as technology, rules and governance, Silvas said.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Tracy Stice on July 21, 2008 - 2:39pm.

Hawaii is watching and waiting for California's success in the state-wide MLS. We anticipate doing the same in the near future. With only 4 MLS systems in our state, it would seem like a no brainer. The good old fashioned provincial attitute of not sharing inventory is being overwhelmed by the internet. With almost 30 years in the business, I am qualified to be a dinosaur, however, my 25 year son and business partner, Jeremy, keeps pushing me along. In this market, it is change or die. I am not ready to be a fossil yet although I may resemble one. Hooray for California ! Better we take control of our destiny before some 3rd party private company does.

Tracy S. Stice Realtor
ABR CRS CRB GRI e-Pro
Century 21 All Islands
7 E. Kaahumanu Ave.
Kahului, Hi. 96732
office 808-877-0025 cell 808-281-5411 fax 808-877-0027
2004 Maui Realtor of the Year, Hawaii Assn. of Realtors 1st Vice President
Tracy@

 
Submitted by Susan Goulding on July 21, 2008 - 3:05pm.

As a member of 3 of the involved MLS's it is an ongoing issue. There are issues that still need to be addressed, as in access - not everyone shares the same "supra key" so you can belong to one MLS, view all the information for all MLS's, and not be able to show your clients the property. THEN what happens, the local agent is expected to show the out of area client the property..... We're headed the right direction now get it done.

Susan Goulding, Realtor
Keller Williams
Tracy - Mountain House, CA
209-914-5573 Direct
209-496-9371 FAX
Inman@SusanGoulding.com

 
Submitted by Michael Espiritu on July 21, 2008 - 4:11pm.

As a broker-member of the MLS Alliance as well as a member of the Multi-Regional Multiple Listing Service (which is the precursor of CARETS)I welcome the new member MLS'into the Alliance. I am also the MRMLS Operations Committee Representative for the East Valley Association of Realtors so I am seeing first-hand the exciting changes that are taking place in our region.
My client base includes people from Orange County all the way to the high desert (Victorville, Apple Valley) and Palm Springs/ Rancho Mirage area. I have to join multiple MLS's to be able to show prospective buyers inventory or to list property in those other areas. It can be costly and cumbersome and I like where we are heading out here in California.
Susan stated incorrectly that a different key is required and that is just not the case. Supra just rolled out the new key to replace the display key and even prior to that the same key would work in multiple jurisdictions as long as you were a member in good standing of the affected MLS.
Some area MLS's will not allow and do not like "outsiders" listing or showing property in "their" area. This type of close-mindedness does not benefit our clients. Should it really matter if I represent a buyer from outside of the area if that buyer is well-qualified,can close the deal, and the broker is professional and knowledgeable ?
CARETS is coming but it will only include those MLS's willing to participate. Some MLS's will join and some won't. I feel the members should decide and go with the model that provides the most ease of use, gives the most accurate information, and gives the information the quickest.
CARETS is ready for roll-out in September 2008.
MRMLS already has the experience w/ data sharing and implementation and the CARETS product should not disappoint. Those that do not adapt to change will be out of the business. Embracing change can benefit out industry tremendously and I welcome it!
Michael Espiritu
Broker
Copeland Wealth Management

 
Submitted by on July 21, 2008 - 4:27pm.

My MLS is a member of the Alliance in Virginia. It has proven to be a valuable resource, although there are practical obstacles that need to be overcome (lock box access is a big one). It is a great idea, in theory. It is the actual practice that is going to need some time to improve.

http://www.RealEstateZebra.com

 
Submitted by on July 21, 2008 - 4:51pm.

That's why I love this website, great info. I'm going to contact MLSAlliance and learn more about what they're doing right now.

@Tracy - This is great news about Hawaii. Currently, we combine the MLS systems on our Hawaii real estate search engine, but I will say the dues are very expensive when you are a member of each board and MLS system. It would also make the data delivered to us more consistent and easier to work with.

--
Justin Britt
Head-Web-Head
Hawaii Life Real Estate Services, LLC
Kauai real estate | Real Estate Marketing

 
Submitted by Richard Fisher on July 21, 2008 - 8:54pm.

As a member of 8 MLSs a Statewide MLS is long over due. Human Inertia.

Advertise with Inman