FBI boosts mortgage fraud caseload

Most suspicious activity still not investigated

Inman News

The FBI had more than 1,200 mortgage fraud investigations open at the end of fiscal year 2007, a 47 percent increase from the previous year but still a small fraction of suspected cases.

The number of suspicious activity reports (SARs) filed by banks detailing suspected mortgage fraud incidents grew 31 percent during the same period, to 46,717.

Although federally chartered banks are required to file SARs with the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), many other mortgage lenders are exempt, suggesting that the FBI is investigating only a small fraction of mortgage fraud cases.

In a report last year, the bureau said it investigated 818 mortgage fraud cases in 2006, winning 204 convictions and collecting $389 million in restitution and $231 million in fines (see story).The bureau did not release information on 2007 convictions, restitution and fines in its latest report.

The FBI said the top 10 hot spots for mortgage fraud were Florida, Georgia, Michigan, California, Illinois, Ohio, Texas, New York, Colorado and Minnesota. Other states "significantly affected" by mortgage fraud included Arizona, Maryland, Utah, Nevada, Missouri, Indiana, Tennessee, Virginia, New Jersey and Connecticut.

"The downward trend in the housing market provides an ideal climate for mortgage fraud perpetrators to employ a myriad of schemes," the FBI said in a press release announcing the release of the report. "Emerging and re-emerging schemes in 2007 included builder-bailouts, seller assistance, short sales, foreclosure rescue, and identity theft exploiting home equity lines of credit."

According to the report, builder-bailout schemes may involve incentives to buyers that are not disclosed on mortgage loan documents. A builder who is having trouble selling a property may agree to return a buyer's down payment, for example, inflating the value of the home to conceal the fact that the homeowner has no equity.

While 93 percent of SARs filed with FinCEN did not quantify specific losses, the 7 percent of reports that included loss estimates totaled more than $813 million.

Those losses are "just the tip of the iceberg, reflecting only a small percentage of financial damage suffered by victims of mortgage fraud," said Kenneth W. Kaiser, assistant director of the FBI's Criminal Investigative Division.

The report relied on numbers from a number of public and private sources, including FinCEN, the Mortgage Bankers Association, the Mortgage Asset Research Institute, HUD's Office of the Inspector General, BasePoint Analytics, Interthinx, Fannie Mae, Radian Guaranty Inc. and RealtyTrac Inc.

In its own analysis of FinCEN reports, the industry-backed Mortgage Asset Research Institute concluded that it could take three to five years before many instances of fraud and misrepresentation in loans made in 2007 are discovered. Many adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans will be refinanced, "potentially blocking discovery of some of these issues," MARI concluded (see story).

In the past, the FBI's mortgage fraud investigations have typically involved fraudulent attempts to obtain money from lenders by inflating the value of multiple properties. Often such schemes involve straw buyers and collusion by real estate professionals including appraisers, title and real estate agents and mortgage brokers.

The FBI is also engaged in a broader investigation of how mortgages were originated and bundled into securities during the housing boom. In January, the bureau briefed reporters on an investigation involving 14 financial services companies, mortgage lenders and investment banks.

The FBI did not identify the companies under investigation, but Goldman Sachs, Bear Stearns and Morgan Stanley have all disclosed to investors that they are responding to subpoenas from regulators.

Countrywide Financial Corp. has also been identified in news reports as a subject of that investigation. The FBI is reportedly looking at Countrywide's underwriting practices on stated-income loans, and whether Countrywide misrepresented its financial condition and the quality of its loans in regulatory filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (see story).

In a regulatory filing this week, company officials said they have been informed by the Department of Justice "that the FBI cannot confirm or deny whether it is conducting an investigation" of Countrywide.

***

What's your opinion? Leave your comments below or send a letter to the editor.

You must login or register to post a comment.

 
Submitted by Patricia Kurtz on May 14, 2008 - 6:51am.

I am a victim of fraud that I experienced through ASC, America Servicing Co. I refinanced in April of 2006 with New Century Mortgage Co and they were in active Chapter 11. I am a single mother, am now losing my home and EVERYTHING I have due to all my personal information being advertised via the web. I have lost thousands of dollars and my life. I now have to start over. I have sought legal assistance, proceeded on my own to be proactive through the government and my community. My bank accounts, my home, my ss#, EVERYTHING has been compromised. I made payments electronically to ASC and they claim they were never made. I was put into foreclosure without notice and my home was advertised in the paper before I knew. I filed Chapter 13 to save my home within 15 days of the sale. ASC has tried to dismiss my BK 3 times since my filing in March of 2007. HELP! I should never have been in the position I am in and have learned a WEALTH of information on my own in addition to INMAN NEWS. ASC STILL claims no payments but my HO has been paid, my taxes were paid, and I received an end of the year interest statement. I was also sent another AMENDED tax statment for 2007 dated 4/10/2008 for an additional $1500. What is up with that if I never paid! I did write a letter and was allowed to meet with the BK judge Frank Santaro to plead my case of the fraud. Any suggestions? Please help me. Wachovia bank has allowed so many unauthorized drafts from my bank account even with security notes from people neither they or I can trace or know.

 
Submitted by Wenceslao Fernandez Jr on June 12, 2008 - 6:56pm.

Some people look for trouble, while others avoid it. I try to avoid it.

I don't like orange on me nor bling on my wrists in addition to the fact that, I've been told I don't photograph well (visit my website and judge for yourself).

However, I wonder if, in the final analysis, people in the large institutions who actually approved the underwriting of a loan that perhaps should not have been made will also be charged.

A lot of the media hype seems to be pointing to the investigation of the little guy/gal mortgage broker, loan processor or loan officer and Mr/Mrs Homeowner.

What about those who actually concucted these crazy mortgage products? How about those who put their seal of approval on the file which caused funds to get transfered and exchanged for keys?

Although it is quite known that many homeowners and investors (well...I'm using that term VERY loosely - these were a little below the speculator in fact. Probably somewhere between the one who pulls levers at slot machines in Las Vegas and the one who bets on horses), purchased when they very well shouldn't have and what's worse, shouldn't have been approved either.

Responsibility for this mess is in the hands of everyone. Yes, some of us in the business also got some of the dirty, blood money resulting from that sale or that refi.

From the media person boasting about the economy, to the marketing genius who invented the many products and ways to sell it, to the bank officers and directors who approved their course of action and the government officials who did not intervene sooner (even in a democratic country, I guess the message nowadays is that government should have interfered, just as they are expected to act now and in a way, are doing so by cracking down), and the sales forces who facilitated both sides of the transaction to the home inspector, appraiser, title/escrow agent or closing attorney, we all have blood money on our hands to some extent.

Who is really to blame and how do we ensure this happens no more (though of course, one the problem is fixed, someone will come up with the next loophole or scam)? I don't know and perhaps, we'll never trully know. But I hope it goes away soon and never comes back.

Just hope all out tax dollars now covering this massive clean-up being spearheaded by the FBI and other similar agencies trully serves the purpose (I hope) is intended.

www.MiamiRealEstateKing.com
Certified Distressed Property Expert
Miami-Dade County, Florida.

Advertise with Inman